Hi everyone,
Following my Pirad 5 phone call on 18/2 where I was completely stunned so couldn't really engage my brain to ask sufficient questions, I am now reflecting on what the radiologist said and you may have some answers for me in this regard.
Told I was a Pirad 5 with a highly suspicious image measuring 15mms on one side.I now understand that this is not a definitive cancer diagnosis hence the the biopsy. She just made me feel that I had cancer with her wording during that phone call.
Prostate enlarged to 42mms.- PSA 4.7 up from 3.2 in Sept 24.
MRI showed no spread outside of the capsule. My question is, how accurate is that assessment? The radiologist was very confident on that point, but how detailed is the imaging and why could she be that confident without a bone scan or whatever?
Biopsy done yesterday by the way and I now await the results in approx 6 weeks as per the consultant who carried out the biopsy. Seems a long wait. Is that typical? I was expecting 2 to 3 weeks not 6.
The correlation between my slightly elevated PSA and the MRI seems very inconsistent but maybe I am looking at it far too logically.
To be honest I am so confused and all over the place with it.
Hi Murphy
I think that MRI pretty good at determining if tumour contained.
First of all PSA really not particularly high, ok 15mm size getting on a bit, could be worth checking if it is nearing the capsule edge cos at 15mm it could be but not necessarily.
Probably the next most important part is biopsy results cos if a lowish Gleeson 6 or 7 then unlikely to have spread so just wait for that.
But do just check how near to the capsule edge is tumour although until biopsy result obviously don't know if it is cancer.
All the best
Steve
Hi, welcome, though sorry you find yourself here.
I doubt that MRI is always as accurate re surrounding ex-prostate area as is often claimed. Mine was reckoned to be within only and my EBRT delivered accordingly. 4 years later extensive distant spread. None showing (on PSMA PET scan) in prostate, so RT presumably got the prostate clear but there was already some lurking outside.
My Consultant did not deny this, simply resorted to "well, it's always different....".
PSMA PET will i think find smaller sites than MRI and if you can blag that very expensive investigation then I would do so.
OTOH, odds on that will find everything and that if well within rather than hard up against edge yours found in good time.
Can but ask about certainty.
Hello Murphy22
I trust the MRI Scan - let’s face it, you have a very expensive piece of kit and a well trained radiographer and the system has been trusted for years.
You have Pirads5 which means they had a clear unobstructed view of the prostate - they can see the tumour and that the edge of the prostate is unbroken.
The biopsy will tell you if the tumour is cancer and the Gleason score how aggressive it is.
You need to stay away from Dr Google and place your trust in your team. I would start chasing your results after a couple of weeks.
Best wishes - Brian.

Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm
Strength, Courage, Faith, Hope, Defiance, VICTORY.
I am a Macmillan volunteer.
Whatever cancer throws your way, we’re right there with you.
We’re here to provide physical, financial and emotional support.
© Macmillan Cancer Support 2026 © Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland. A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales company number 2400969. Isle of Man company number 4694F. Registered office: 3rd Floor, Bronze Building, The Forge, 105 Sumner Street, London, SE1 9HZ. VAT no: 668265007