I am sorry I am posting again. I have had my first BCG which went okay. However, somewhere on this site someone referred to the NICE guidelines for high grade non muscle invasive ladder cancer which I read. This says a second TURBT procedure should be carried out six weeks after the first. I have only had one TURBT on the 19th of October and commenced on BCG a few days ago. I am trying to calm my increasing anxiety but reading these nice guidelines. I don’t think that I was given any information about risk of progression. The consultant just said bladder removal was a serious surgery with risks and then went on to talk fully about BCG. I then spoke to the specialist nurses and asked why I wasn’t really offered bladder removal and she said it would be overkill. However, this seems to be Contrary to what the nice guidelines say? I’ve copied these below. I feel as though I haven’t really been able to make a fully informed decision as the decision almost seems to have been made for me. I cannot understand why it is overkill to seek bladder removal When the NICE guidelines say it should be offered. I have not been given any figures for success rate for BCG either. I’m starting to think if the cancer doesn’t get me, the anxiety will kill me. I don’t want to drive my specialist nurse mad with these queries, but if there is such a risk of progression, I am wondering whether to seek a second opinion. My tumour was small / under 1cm but is G3pTa with squamous differentiation urethral plus CIS.
NICE guidelines
If the first TURBT shows high‑risk non‑muscle‑invasive bladder cancer, offer another TURBT as soon as possible and no later than 6 weeks after the first resection.
I had my second opinion from James Catto in Sheffield; he wrote an educational article, talking about the benefits of early Radical Cystectomy versus later RC, following unsuccessful BCG immunotherapy (especially in his steel worker patient base).
Interestingly, despite this article if I hadn’t already come into his consulting room almost decided on Radical Cystectomy, he would have suggested BCG immunotherapy as his recommended treatment. (whilst my consultant in Bradford had been very much 50/50 & only RC when I absolutely pushed for a recommendation)
He did admit that in cases of high grade non muscle invasive bladder cancer with CIS (never mind my extra risk factors) if your primary consideration is living as long as possible choose RC over BCG, but also that most people don’t, mainly due to the ensuing sexual dysfunction.
However, people don’t die having BCG immunotherapy, but there is definitely a peri-operative mortality risk to major surgery!
Sorry, I realise I probably haven’t helped your decision process much at all!
Best wishes
Gareth
Hi Jessie15
I had two TURBTs with G3T1 (with squamous differentiation) advised after the first (3 x1.5cm tumours), and G3Ta (one tumour) after the second. Around 10 weeks between the two. The consultant I was seeing at the time (Watford) offered BCG or RC, with a strong push for RC. After the second TURBT I had carefully considered the options based on what I understood at the time and opted for RC, at which point I was referred to the surgeon at another Trust (Lister).
Met with the surgeon who appeared quite upset that I hadn't had any treatment up to that point (~4 months from the first TURBT), but advised that the best course for me in his opinion would be BCG, with the option for RC if things didn't work out. I was 63 at the time, and am male.
Now had 15 BCG instillations and OK so far .. next cystoscopy on Monday (fingers crossed).
I was somewhat further assured that after the BCG induction course he performed a rigid blue light cystoscopy and found nothing untoward. All other cystoscopies have been flexibles, and no recurrence so far. I have continued my care with the Lister Hospital, Stevenage since meeting with the surgeon.
The selected treatment is a difficult decision, but one that we all must make. I have no regrets on following the advice of the surgeon, but we are all different and whatever you decide will be the right decision for you.
Thank you very much for taking the time to reply. Interesting how the surgeon differed in opinion. I am being treated at Hilllingdon hospital. I would be interested to know who your surgeon was - my sister in law mentioned there was an excellent consultant urologist based at the Lister. I was very much directed towards BCG. Will hope that this is successful.
Wishing you all the best for your forthcoming cystoscopy.
As you have started on BCG without adverse side effects so far, seems sensible to continue with that while you seek more information/opinion. I think I mentioned that I was TaG3 & given the option, decided on surgery. My choice was for peace of mind, among other reasons, but it is a major undertaking. Lots to weigh up, considering your personal circumstances and so on so as to make an informed decision. The big problem is not knowing who will be in the approx 30% cured with BCG, or the remainder who will need more aggressive treatment (surgery with or without chemo, or maybe chemo plus radiotherapy), or the few who become incurable. It is undoubtedly a worry, but once you have made a choice, based on all the information available, hopefully you will feel more confident going forward. Best wishes.
Hi Jessie
I think the BCG success rate is ~70% from memory, but quite a few drop out of the treatment due to side effects, and some go on the RC later.
PM me for the surgeons name. Don't think it right to identify an individual on an open platform. Will also be able to give you further info if you want.
Whatever cancer throws your way, we’re right there with you.
We’re here to provide physical, financial and emotional support.
© Macmillan Cancer Support 2025 © Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland. A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales company number 2400969. Isle of Man company number 4694F. Registered office: 3rd Floor, Bronze Building, The Forge, 105 Sumner Street, London, SE1 9HZ. VAT no: 668265007