I hate it that my wife of thirty years left me, it nearly 4 years on, I have a new kind and understanding partner, but below the surface I hate living, missing, grieving, I just miss that comfort, that support, both our Girls 28 and 34 need what I cannot give them, a mums understanding. Four yers on and I am so furious
I add to this, miss diagnoses, you have sinusitis,3 months from hospital to hospital, only locum after two years of treatment for sinuses problems got my wife flown away to Stornoway hospital, after a month flown away to Inverness, after a month in Inverness before-diagnosis, transfers five hours by road to Glasgow to be finally told , it’s treatable , the three months later to be told it’s terminated. I can give them there due, they gave Adele here wish that she could die at home in our bed, three wonderful weeks of being able to hold her hand and go to sleep in our bed. I will never forgive them, the hope they gave use and the flawed diagnosis. NOTHING SINISTER, she would be alive if not for that first diagnosis.
u
Dear Leehebs,
I was very interested to read your post. My position is I am about to start the process of addressing the negligence in my Sharon’s case, she passed 17/10/21. In July 2020 she saw a consultant at local hospital who said the visual “sore” on her upper abdomen was scar tissue from previous keyhole surgery to remove her gall bladder. Despite Sharon highlighting to him a small growth he ignored her and referred her to pain management, I will never forget Sharon coming out of the consultation I completely heartbroken. We then found a consultant to see her privately, he acknowledged the growth and arranged scan, etc.. by which time the lump had grown. Cut the story short this consultant operated on April 14th 2021, an operation that took 3.5 hours and removed a mass the size of a fist !! Outcome was the mass was cancerous and by the time she met the oncologist it was stage 4. Chemo and radiotherapy was tried, but she continued to suffer and passed as I say on 17/10/21.
My case of negligence is based on fact the two consultants NEVER sent her for a biopsy on the growth, had they done so I may still have Sharon with me. My aim ideally is to get the two consultants s
uck off, as a biopsy is considered standard practice for any patient presenting with a growth that continues to grow. I have no interest in financial compensation as no matter how much it will neverring me darling Sharon back to me 
Good luck and best wishes,
Paul
