Hi all not posted for awhile but still look in to see how everyone’s getting on.
After a 4 week wait I received my mri report which was encouraging, little change since last mri , unchanged nodule on right peripheral zone and prostatic capsule intact , Normal seminal vesicles.
precise 3 Stable MRI appearance with focal lesions identified. T2 No
Into 4th year on a/s and after 4 mri’s and 3 biopsy I was glad the consultant told me he didn’t think I would need another biopsy just now, after having a bad experience on 2 of the 3 biopsy’s I was relived at this. This was the old style biopsy’s.
My PSA has crept up to 11.1–10.6 consultant told me if the psa increases from this I would have another biopsy but as I’ve just got my last psa reading of 10.3 this offers some encouragement
it’s been a strange time this past 4 years knowing I have pc but it’s not been to stressful I try not to worry to much and put it at the back of my mind I think I’m lucky and get on with life
The only time I did worry was before this last mri when i had 2 consecutive readings over 10, but as consultant said I’ve a history of fluctuating psa readings he still recommends staying on a/s
Best wishes to everyone on here
Roy
Hello Roy (Fleet )
Thank you for a detailed and encouraging update - you are doing well to stay on AS with a PSA in double figures, however if you and your consultant are happy long may it continue.
It's a positive post and I hope help others who chose this path on their personal prostate cancer journey.
Best wishes - Brian.

Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm
Strength, Courage, Faith, Hope, Defiance, VICTORY.
I am a Macmillan volunteer.
Hi David
Good to hear your mri was good the 4 week wait is sometimes the worse.
Your similar to me and it’s good you’ve been on a/s for 9 years, what’s your psa levels now?
Having psa levels over 10 is slightly concerning but as consultant told me my fluctuating psa levels could be down to having enlarged prostate.
Being on a/s as long as you have gives encouragement for many others that a/s is an option that should be given serious consideration.
Allthe best to you also
Roy.
Hi Roy
My latest PSA was 8.1. That is high but the consultant wasn't concerned because the MRI was Ok. The high PSA could be due to prostate inflammation, from which I have suffered since my 38 core biopsy in 2017. I have not had any more biopsies since then.
I agree with you that active surveillance should be seriously considered by anyone with a low risk cancer who has been offered it. When I was first diagnosed with pc in 2017 my initial reaction was just get rid of it. I was offered surgery and I almost had it. However I read hundreds of posts on this excellent site about people's experiences and I chose active surveillance.
Sounds ok Fleet
I was on AS for 4 years and started treatment when PSA and tumour had reached a certain level.
Could be just worth checking on tumour size in mm as u don't want anything too large not that I'm saying it is.
As long as they/you keep monitoring PSA and MRI everything looks fine.
All the best
Steve
Hello Steve (Grundo )
The NICE Guidelines for AS are here at 1.3.14.
NICE Guidelines - Prostate Cancer.
You will see the specific instructions for an MRI scan are:
* Between 12 - 18 months on AS
* At any other time there is clinical concern or a rise in PSA.
You can ask for one but you are lucky to get one on a regular basis.
Best wishes - Brian.

Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm
Strength, Courage, Faith, Hope, Defiance, VICTORY.
I am a Macmillan volunteer.
Hi Steve
Ive tried finding out tumour size but can’t see it on biopsy or mri , I spoke to consultant last year and took notes , my notes say tumour size is 1cm but I might have been confused at the time and got that wrong.
I see 2 nodule readings on biopsy is that anything to do with tumour size.
Hope you’re keeping well Roy.
Hi Fleet - the journey you describe is not unlike my own. In March 2022 at age 74 with a PSA of 10.93 I went through the usual process of MRI and biopsy at my local hospital and was diagnosed as "best regarded" Gleason 3+4 and offered, as usual, treatment radiotherapy or surgery.
I got a second opinion (essential) at the Christie in Manchester where, having viewed the slides, the pathologist said the 4 content was minimal and therefore "best regarded" as Gleason 3+3.
I've been on AS since then with three further mpMRI scans showing no change in the prostate and fluctuating PSA levels between 10 and 16 which include spikes because of UTIs at the time.
I should also point out that I have a very large prostate of 94cc which accounts for much of the PSA. Indeed, my average PSA density is 0.12, well under the threshold of concern. PSA density is a very important measurement in prostate cancer and often overlooked.
Gleason 3+3 is very low grade (some experts now even say it isn't even cancer) and rarely progresses. You don't mention your age but I'd certainly suggest stay on AS which is becoming more and more the norm for our grade of cancer. In your situation you can take your time and there are several treatment options available if you feel that's best for you.
Kind regards.
Whatever cancer throws your way, we’re right there with you.
We’re here to provide physical, financial and emotional support.
© Macmillan Cancer Support 2026 © Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland. A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales company number 2400969. Isle of Man company number 4694F. Registered office: 3rd Floor, Bronze Building, The Forge, 105 Sumner Street, London, SE1 9HZ. VAT no: 668265007