Hi all,
I’ve been told I can possibly take part in a trial that involves less lymph node removal - only removing the one’s infected, rather than the whole lot, as is current practice here. Apparently, this is how they have been doing it in the USA and Holland for a while, but we are a bit behind.
I’m curious as to whether anyone else has been asked or is involved the trial, and what your thoughts are about it..?
Hi KellyCol welcome to the forum. That sounds interesting and I hadn't heard of this before.
As far as I am aware in the UK it is standard practice to take the Sentinel node for testing and if no Cancer is found in that then no further lymph nodes are removed. If the lymph nodes behind the sentinel node are found to have Cancer cells, then they will proceed to remove as many as are neccesary to get clear margins which may or may not involve taking all the nodes. So I am unclear where the thought has come that we are behind as I understand that to be standard practice in this country but maybe someone else has other experiences that they can share with usi
Hi Evajean, It is the norm here in US too. If sentinel node clear no others removed. Total axilla clearance is done but I am going to research it more. Since I was over 70 my surgical oncologist said he did not need to do sentinel lymph node bx as I was stage 1a and that was the latest research. However my radiation oncologist did radiate my left lower lymph so go figure. I will send out link when I find info on total axilla clearance. Happy Sunday.
Barbara
Barbara
Barbara
Forgot to send the link. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7811626/
Barbara
Barbara
Here is the link. I accidentally sent it to myself before. Duh!!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7811626/
Barbara
Barbara
Hi everyone. Perhaps it depends where you are seen.
I've just had a lumpectomy at St George's Hospital in Tooting. First sentinel lymph node cancerous, second one clear.
My surgeon said that up to a year ago, it was standard practice to remove all lymph nodes if any were found to be cancerous - even if only one. But research has shown that zapping the lymph nodes with radiotherapy is as effective as removing them, and is much more beneficial for the patient. Much less chance of developing lymphoedema or other unpleasant side effects.
I thank my lucky stars that I got breast cancer now, not a year ago.
Hope that's helpful. Take care, everyone.
I had two positive nodes and my oncologist recommended zapping the rest instead of a full lymph node removal the was may 2021 I had radiotherapy for five days but natead of over three weeks which they have found is just as effective. This was at the castle hill hospital hull East Riding of yorkshire xx
Whatever cancer throws your way, we’re right there with you.
We’re here to provide physical, financial and emotional support.
© Macmillan Cancer Support 2025 © Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland. A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales company number 2400969. Isle of Man company number 4694F. Registered office: 3rd Floor, Bronze Building, The Forge, 105 Sumner Street, London, SE1 9HZ. VAT no: 668265007