Hi I was diagnosed with Grade 3 oestrogen positive breast cancer a few weeks ago just had mastectomy with reconstruction 2 weeks ago. The cancer was 80mm but my lymphnodes were clear they want to give me chemotherapy and radiotherapy now based on my age 36, grade and size of the cancer.
Has anyone been in this situation and not gone ahead with the chemotherapy? They have told me that the cancer is gone now and that the treatments being offered are to make sure that nothing escaped. My cancer is oestrogen sensitive and so they have said that I will be given tablets for the next 10 years to suppress my hormones, so I’m thinking if they are doing that why do I need chemo and radio when I won’t have any hormones to allow the cancer to grown again?
My head is
Hi
You are young and you have a lot of years ahead of you.
Take a look with this tool from the NHS - you can see the benefits of having chemo. in % based over 5 - 15 years.
When you think about it, even a 1% advantage at your age is a lot and your team wouldn't recommend you having something which they feel is not needed. Just playing around with the information you've given, it looks as if it's over 10% additional benefit over the long term to have chemo.
Hope this helps a little.
Best wishes, Lesley
Thanks Lesley from the calculations it’s 22% with surgery 38% with hormone therapy and 47% with chemotherapy....I never thought I would be contemplating my own death at 36! Seems like chemo is a no brainier if I want to see another 15 years (brb just gonna cry in a corner for a while)
Hi
That seems a particularly low % considering no lymph node involvement? Perhaps at this stage, just look at the figures for what benefits it gives, rather than the survival rate or you'll drive yourself silly with worry!
I met a 50 year old lady when I was first diagnosed who had BC 15 -20 years previously and she had a lumpectomy, but refused to even take Tamoxifen - given that she was still going strong, I wonder if the %'s are based on some cases in their study, rather than everyone?.(which is probably why they say look at it in conjunction with your doctor). I personally would always recommend taking whatever treatment your team suggests as they've seen it 100's/1000's of times and know a lot more than we ever will. The main thing for this predict tool is to use it for benefits and try, if you can to ignore mortality - that's what I did anyway when I was thinking about taking the tablets
Best wishes, Lesley
Thanks Lesley I will try and ignore mortality was hoping that after this was over I would kinda live to a good age given they my doctors are telling me now I’m cancer free! I’m seeing the oncologist for the 1st time in a couple of weeks so maybe best for me not to think about any of it until then or I will actually go insane
Hi schittscreek
it’s scary I know; I had mastectomy 16 years ago with just one node involved and grade 2 HR sensitive. Was unsure about chemo but had it in the end. Your name is a good description of how I felt! I then had ten years hormonal therapy. After 16 years it has reappeared; that’s a lot of extra time which I may not have got without chemo. Treatment has improved dramatically too, so there are options that didn’t exist in 2005. Worth a few uncomfortable weeks to me and my family! Best of luck x
Whatever cancer throws your way, we’re right there with you.
We’re here to provide physical, financial and emotional support.
© Macmillan Cancer Support 2025 © Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland. A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales company number 2400969. Isle of Man company number 4694F. Registered office: 3rd Floor, Bronze Building, The Forge, 105 Sumner Street, London, SE1 9HZ. VAT no: 668265007