PICC line &port

Hello....

I suggest you tell them exactly what you've written here about your son. 

I have had both a port and a picc and the port sounds a much better option for you because it is inserted under the skin. I had a small anaesthetic patch to put on before each chemo. Afterwards it leaves a small scar but it's close to the collar bone and doesn't notice unless you are looking for it.

I had a picc for a second operation when I needed anti biotics and had no veins. It can catch on clothes and would definitely not be a good idea if someone might grab your arm or punch you. Showering is awkward and it has to be flushed weekly. 

I don't know the procedure at Birmingham hospitals but a port does require a slightly longer op to put it in. Mine took 10 minutes under general anaesthetic.

I hope you can have a sensible discussion with the oncologists. If I needed chemo in future I would request the port. There was no comparison.

I wish you well. Love Karen.

I think you need to state what you would like - and stand firm. The consultant at first said I did not warrant a port - but the chemo ward sister fought my case and I have a port now. the actual insertion was very straightforward - I had a local anaesthetic and it was absolutely fine.

Wishing you good luck x

It does sound as if a port would be safer for you. You can have them in your chest and they are completely sealed under the skin. It may be that your unit does not use them at all - they need to be accessed with a special needle so it’s a question of whether your oncology unit is equipped for them and also whether your hospital has a radiology day case unit that can fit them. But if they do and it’s a case of waiting lists or only offering them to people on long term treatment, being clear about your situation might work wonders. Sorry you are in this situation. I have had a port for over 3 years and it is great.