Hi, new poster, interested in several posts on the forum concerning BHP/Large Prostate/increased PSA.
i was diagnosed with BHP and acute retention at age 47.
Started intermittent self catheterisation on diagnosis of BHP.
Been under observation since with annual
PSA tests. Occasional UTI due to catheter use. Procedure to remove bladder stones.
2 years ago had blood in urine resulting in MRI and CT scans, no concerns reported. Prostate size recorded as 104cc. PSA 4.
Annual PSA check carried out november 2025, reported 11.
PSA density was cause for concern - hospital visit for rectal exam and discussion.
MRI arranged in 3 weeks time.
Explanation of PiRAD system provided i.e level 1-5 and what these meant and led to.
Possibility of biopsy depending on PiRAD result.
A few things have come to mind which i would appreciate views on from other members.
It is apparently normal for those with BHP to be prescribed alpha blockers to help reduce prostate size, i’ve never had these and wonder why not? Would my prostate be as large as it is currently had i used tamusolin or finestride?
Also, given the size of my prostate at 104cc, should i have by now been offered HoLEP procedure to reduce the volume?
Thanks in advance
Hi Hop1
Welcome to our community, I hope you find it both informative and supportive.
When I was diagnosed with BHP my urologist presrcribed tamulosin and I have been on that for a while. Recently after a couple of bursts of epidimitis my GP suggested that if I wanted I could move over to finestride but so far I have not taken that. I am not aware that tamulosin would affect the size of the prostrate itself.
Hopefully the tests you are going through will pick up any reason for the higher PSA, fingers crossed it is nothing serious. Perhaps it might be a good idea when you get the results to talk about next steps including is a HoLEP might be approrpiate.
<<hugs>>
Steve
Hi, thanks for sharing your experience, yes following the MRI i’m due to meet a uroligist to discuss results. I believe the discussion to be whether or not to have a biopsy.
my plan is that in the absence of a lesion which i guess is when a biopsy would be suggested, then to discuss a HoLEP, it isn’t offered by our trust so it would require a referral outside of the area. I believe our Trust use the TURP method which research suggests is not as effetive as Holep and recovery is longer.
thanks again
Hello Hop1
Welcome to the group - although I am so sorry to find you here.
I didn't have BPH - however I did have a large prostate - indeed it grew into my urethra, caused my bladder to swell with retained urine - which then attempted to kill me off by crushing my kidneys stopping them from working.
So after being fitted with an indwelling catheter to get me passing urine again, once my kidney function returned to something like near normal - I hade a TURP to open up the urethra. This was 2021/2022 (click on my name or avatar for the full story).
Since the TURP in November 2022 I have had no issues but was warned i may need further treatment in say 10 years. All is good so far.
I hope this story helps - if you need to know anything else just ask,
Best wishes - Brian.

Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm
Strength, Courage, Faith, Hope, Defiance, VICTORY.
I am a Macmillan volunteer.
Thanks for sharing.
i was diagnosed with BPH in 2007 after struggling to pass urine. Unbeknow to me this had resulted in my bladder stretching to the point i was 1.5 Litres. I was put on intermittent self cathertisation immediately, The downside to that was i have not been able to empty my bladder or urinate without a catheter since. I was utinating prior but with difficulty.
In the 18yrs since diagnosis, i have had 3 meetings with a consultant to discuss condition, 2 cystoscopies, 1 procedure to remove bladder stones, following a period where i was having blood in my urine an mri and ct scan no issues found other than enlarged prostate which by now was 104cc.
To be honest, other than the nuisance of self cathetising 4 times a day and the occadional UTI there’s been no major issues.
i’m not one for procedures unless absolutely necessary, my interest in the prostate reduction is driven by my prostate protruding uncomfortably into my rectum. I am hoping a resection would relieve this.
The consultant also suggested i could vonsider an electrical implant to correct the signalling issues that prevent me from emptying my bladder.
So interesting time
thanks again
Hello Hop1.
Well not being medically qualified I don't know what the answer to your long term issue is - I know the TURP worked for me and I now keep an eye on my eGFR too!
I can remember about 12 months ago we had a Community member who had the electrical implant to enable him to empty his bladder at will - I can't find the thread - but I recall it wasn't a complicated operation and it was working well.
Good luck moving forward and do let us know how you get on.
Best wishes - Brian.

Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm
Strength, Courage, Faith, Hope, Defiance, VICTORY.
I am a Macmillan volunteer.
Whatever cancer throws your way, we’re right there with you.
We’re here to provide physical, financial and emotional support.
© Macmillan Cancer Support 2026 © Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland. A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales company number 2400969. Isle of Man company number 4694F. Registered office: 3rd Floor, Bronze Building, The Forge, 105 Sumner Street, London, SE1 9HZ. VAT no: 668265007