Can anyone help me understand my results?

  • 3 replies
  • 160 subscribers
  • 160 views

Afternoon all,

I had a recent biopsy and the report reads as follows:

'Prostatic adenocarcinoma. Right-sided prostate, one out of seven cores involved. Left- sided prostate, zero out of seven cores involved. Targeted zero out of three cores involved. Gleason 3+3=6.'

I don't really understand the core references- does it mean that just one core returned a result of cancer? 

The area that I'm most worried about, though, came back as inconclusive, so I had to have a second biopsy which took place a few days ago. This area is referred to as a '20mm index lesion within the left posterior peripheral zone mid gland. PI-RADS 5, Likert 4, prostate volume 56mL, PSA density 0.11.' on my MRI report. My PSA was 6.3 going into the biopsy to start with.

I have an anxious wait now for the results and I don't know how worried to be if that makes sense. I have no context to base the numbers on or any idea of how serious it is. The lovely nurse tried to explain, but I really can't remember much of the conversation now as I was in a flap!

Appreciate any guidance or pointers!

With very best wishes,

John.

  • Hi John,

    Others are going to come back with better replies than I have for you, but I will make a start and hope to help.

    It does rather read as it only one core was involved, and they have stated that this was Gleason 6, which is quite low risk and moves very slowly.

    There also seems to me to be a suggestion that no cores in the target area were positive. Yet other results, possibly from an MRI scan, indicate a Pirads 5 lesion which often indicates prostate cancer.

    I am going to assume that's why the second biopsy?

    You might find this helpful -

    https://prostatecanceruk.org/prostate-information-and-support/prostate-tests/prostate-biopsy

    Your are in the worst time for this - waiting for diagnosis and a plan for treatment. We all always think that valuable time is being wasted. This video, from a non-profit organisation in America call the Prostate Cancer Research Institute, might provide same comfort -

     https://youtu.be/aotF2SPzCmU?si=SrjEVOpC5toiznyl

    I hope that others will supply more information.

    Steve

    Changed, but not diminished.
  • Hello John ( 

    From what you have said the MRI (PI-RADS 5/Likert 4) would indicate a strong possibility of Prostate Cancer. It would appear to me the biopsy hasn't taken samples from the affected area (hence the 2nd biopsy). In the first biopsy they have taken 14 samples with one positive.

    Here's our guide to the staging of Prostate Cancer:

    Staging and grading of Prostate Cancer

    With a low PSA and Gleason 6, at the moment there's no need to panic - the second biopsy will hopefully bring the diagnosis to a conclusion.

    i hope the above helps.

    Best wishes - Brian.

    Community Champion badge

    Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm

    Strength, Courage, Faith, Hope, Defiance, VICTORY.

    I am a Macmillan volunteer.

  • Hi  . You are correct that only one of the cores showed adenocarcinoma which is the most common type of prostate cancer.

    The index lesion is usually the main lesion with the highest grade. 20mm is considered a higher risk volume and that, along with the Pirads 5, Likert 4 is why you have had the second biopsy. The posterior peripheral zone is the area closer to the rectum but it is this area which can be associated with a higher risk of recurrence further down the line compared to the transitional zone and why the experts want to confirm whether the lesion is cancerous or not.

    Index lesions are representative of PCa grade in low-risk patients, but the other foci of tumour, the satellite lesions, gain relevance in higher risk patients. 

    The posterior subcapsular region of the prostate is often undersampled. The close proximity of these lesions to the posterior capsular wall of the prostate makes them difficult to localize while increasing the need for early detection because of their increased risk for extracapsular extension.

    I hope you get a definitive diagnosis soon so that you can go forward.