Radical cystectomy Vs BCG treatment choice with aggressive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

  • 148 replies
  • 79 subscribers
  • 5469 views

I’m aged 52, went to the GP the day after peeing Rioja in the sports hall on 19th April. The primary tumour was successfully removed mid May; deep into the connective tissue but not into the muscle, but unfortunately the histology results were as disappointing as possible: high grade cancer, large tumour removed (>3.5cm) with the extra bonus of CIS flat cancer (meaning multiple sites of bladder cancer) - all of these lead to the aggressive nature of this bladder cancer, leading to the risk of spread. 

Before the MDT meeting me & my wife had done our research; there’s a few research papers out there suggesting longer survival rates in patients with CIS & high grade cancer by having early cystectomy, rather than BCG first & cystectomy later. Also, I’m sure I don’t need to tell anyone on this forum board that BCG isn’t a walk in the park! 1/3 of BCG patients don’t complete the 3 year treatment course due to tumour growth, 1/3 complete the treatment course & 1/3 fail to complete the treatment due to the dysuria side-effects!

No more erections for me! I spoke to BRI on Tuesday asking if I could be listed for the radical cystectomy with ileal conduit (neo-bladder not appropriate with the risk of cancer spread) Op; basically if your primary consideration is living the cystectomy is a no brainer (if I have the bladder removed now my odds are very good; 90% chance 5 year survival / 85% if they find some microscopic cancer cells in the muscle lining of the bladder when they analyse the whole removed bladder). Most people choose BCG treatment in the hope they won’t have to have the bladder removed, with the associated body image / urostomy bag problems, loss of sexual functionality & risk of operative morbidity. However, in my case BCG treatment at best would probably only kick the can down the road for 3-5 years until cystectomy was needed (with a reduction in positive outcome from 90-75%)!
4-6 weeks until Op with 3-4 months recovery.Fingers crossed

Anyone else have experience of being diagnosed with aggressive bladder cancer at an earlier age & chose earlier cystectomy?

Thanks

  • My husband had stage 3 muscle invasive bladder at age 63. In October 21 he had radical cystectomy but because he was otherwise healthy he could have the neo bladder. Whilst removal they remove lymph nodes 1 was found cancerous so 6 months after op he had chemotherapy.  Very unpleasant.  I would definitely have a good 6 months off for recovery.  A lot of looking after of the new bladder originally.  But he has made a full recovery new bladder is amazing.  He's off to golf tomorrow. He has regular CT's . The care he was given was amazing. Now he is back to normal we count ourselves very lucky x

    Kimdav

  • Hi Hopeful786,My sister asked the surgeon whether I would be cured with cystectomy.He said there were no guarantees but he would do his best.I remain hopeful that I’m cured.Jane 

  • Hi All

    My cancer was G3T1 (2 tumours with one over 3cm) At my second TURBT where muscle biopsies were taken from the original surgery sites NO cancer cells were detected. I was offered early RC but after long discussions with my surgeon who has a pHD in Bladder Cancer I have opted for BCG with close monitoring. My surgeon has assured me that even fast growing aggressive tumours grow slowly at about 1cm per year so with close monitoring of Cystoscopy, PDD scan and CT any further tumours would be caught early and dealt with through TURBT. Without the security of close monitoring I probably would have opted for the RC. Also as a female I did not want to lose my uterus, ovaries or my urethra during the surgery. I've got 2 more of my induction BCG to go and then a check cystoscopy at the end of July. Hoping for a nice clear scan.

    Not an easy decision for anyone on the forum.

    Best wishes to all whatever your decisions are.

    Love Ade xx

  • Thanks Teasswill

    Lies, damn lies & statistics!  

  • Thanks Teasswill

    Really useful information re recovery. I’m hoping to bring forward my optometry career retirement; ideally sell the business in the next couple of years.

  • Indeed! The main problem is not knowing what group you will fall into. One day, they will be able to get sufficient info from the first biopsy to tell which cancers are likely to respond well to BCG & which not. 

    I don't wish to spread doom, only a sense of reality so that people can make informed decisions. I am still highly sceptical of the claims that patients quote from their consultants, that surveillance will guarantee to catch recurrences before they become muscle invasive. This is not borne out by patients, nor by research papers. 

  • Thanks Kim

    Really good advice. Glad your husband has fully recovered; brilliant news!!

  • Sounds a good plan to enjoy an early retirement. At least the profession is one in which you can easily work part-time if you wish. 

    Do you have some plans for activities in retirement? 

  • Thanks Ade

     Fingers crossed for continued clear scans for you. Absolutely agree with you - there isn’t an obvious same correct treatment option for everyone; just depends on individual histology findings.

  • Hi Teasswill

    Probably a seaside cottage on the North Yorkshire Coast - lots of coastal walks, healthy sea air (ideally Whitby), combined with maybe 1 day a week working, just to supplement living expenses.