Blackmail

3 minute read time.

Blackmail.  Strong word that may upset some people if they read on.There's no sex or swearing in what I hope to write but many may disagree with my views.

I am angry and confused about doctors, nurses and patients.  I was brought up to believe that doctors were supposed to be there for patients who felt ill and wanted help. Doctors were trained to know about illness and what treatments were available. No doctor could know it all so there were hospital specialists or consultants. Nurses were there to look after patients, care for them, give them the medicines the doctors prescribed, feed them if necessary, keep the patients clean and so on. Patients were there to be helped, explained-to, treated with dignity as though they were important to the doctors and nurses.

You get the drift? Things have changed. Medicine and surgery are now high-technologies. Technicians are trained to do many things to, (not with), patients and technicians are often not doctors or nurses. So much is possible that cost gets in the way, waiting for test results and seeing the doctors is the norm. The patient has become a number, a piece of meat to be handled or cooked or drugged. Are you still with me?

Today I had a phone call from a nurse, at least I didn't as I was in the garden working, on my wall. Doing all the heavy stuff myself without motor or electric powered equipment. My wife took the call and said she'd fetch me to call the nurse back. I tried, first the number my wife had written down, -recorded message unreadable to me. Second the hospital switchboard, another recorded message. So I managed to hold on until an operator came who asked what I wanted. Yes, what I wanted! I said I'd like to speak to the oncology nurse who had phoned me from the same hospital minutes before. Gave her name, title and department. The nurse came on the line some minutes later.  "I'm the Trials Nurse" , she said. "Your oncologist asked me to phone you and ask you if you had changed your mind about the trial."  I said "no, I haven't changed my mind and I would need to see the consultant first so he could explain it to me again. I found it difficult to follow him last time".  That was just part of the phone call which was polite and pleasant on both sides but I was furious afterwards.

Why was a nurse I had never met phoning me? My oncologist must have told her about me even though I said to him I would need time to think about the trial and have more information. So I was just a number to be recruited into the trial. Patient confidentiality did not exist. I ended the call with "I'm not about to expire and I was working outside on my garden wall when you first phoned. Sorry to have missed you the first time."  She was pleasant, laughed and said she was pleased that I was doing things.

Trials on patients remind me of being a student. I was 'volunteered' for a drug trial without my agreement. Worse still, one of my room-mates did the 'volunteering' of me without my permission. I refused. But I felt that I was being blackmailed to enter that trial with the threat of not getting good grades in my finals or a good job to follow if I refused.  So now.  I feel pressured to comply this time. Someone is gaining from this trial financially or professionally or both.  The drug firms are in it for the money and it may be that the researchers will hope for professional advancement if the trial goes well, is well received on publication and heralds another 'breakthrough' in medicine. If I don't comply the threat is that I am at least letting people down and at worst may be treated less well in many ways than those who do comply. That is blackmail of a vulnerable patient.

At least being angry made me feel much better and more active for a while.

Anonymous
  • FormerMember
    FormerMember

    Hi David,

    I think you are right when you say that the medial profession is very tehnical these days - but it has probably been thus for many years.

    We are with all modern drugs because of drug trials and I for one are very grateful to the many patients who have taken part in these trials. Ever since I was diagnosed with PCa I have said I would take part in trials when the time came - I told my onco this almost at the very start - but she said you need to take the standard treatment first. I only found out later about the STAMPEDE trial - that is only available in selected hospitals thought the country - but not mine. One of the major advantages of being on trials is you tend to be in the hands of the best doctors and they monitor you much more closely, but there are disadvantages in that you do run the risk of treatment that turns out to be less than optimum and even does harm. For example I know someone who had the chemotherapy early option of stampede and that has damaged his nerves in the legs and made him less able than before.

    But of course I totally agree than no patient should be pressurised into taking part in trials and if declined should still receive the best treatment otherwise available. So if you dont want to take part - dont and if the oncologists is difficult , well seek a second opinion or change of oncologist.

  • FormerMember
    FormerMember

    Thanks, Mal,

    I understand about drug trials and their benefits when the trial statistics are done.  I've read about a PCa patient whose nerves were damaged by radiotherapy.  This must be a risk and is only acceptable if all other options with less risk have been tried.

    I get on well with both my oncologist and my urologist and they've said I may discuss the trial with them in the future if I wish.  It was the unexpected phone call from the Trial Research Nurse that upset me.  However all is well at the moment and she took my remark about 'not being about to expire' in the spirit it was meant.

    Thanks again for your comments