possible vocal cord cancer

  • 3 replies
  • 78 subscribers
  • 155 views

I was on here last year about the same time!  My husband has vocal cord dysplasia.  It was classed as severe and in May he had laser surgery.  Today he had biopsies in clinic as, if anything, it looks worse than before surgery.  The consultant is blithely talking about radiotherapy and surgery as though it's just simple.  My husband is 83 and has, as they say, many co-morbidities.  He is adamant that he won't have radiotherapy but will have surgery if needed.  I agree with him as I don't think he has the stamina to go for 6 weeks treatment  5 days a week.  Also I don't think he'd cope very well with side-effects of RT.   We - slightly jokingly - say that something else will kill him before the vocal cord cancer does. Has anyone been in this situation and what did they decide?

  • Radiotherapy treatment for HPV16 plus related cancer is tough but normally has a very good outcome, not all suffer the severe side effects.... but the choice is down to yourselves...At 68 I was not keen on the treatment but felt that it was my best option...

    Peter 

  • What sort of surgery is being discussed?

    I had base of tongue cancer. I couldn't have surgery so went straight to RT

    It's a challenge but you are well supported and outcomes are good. RT targeted at the larynx maybe won't have such an impact on his mouth so perhaps he could continue to eat soft food. The treatment takes fifteen minutes and is itself painless

    Hope you can all come to a decision that fits

    Dani 

    Base of tongue cancer. T2N0M0 6 weeks Radiotherapy finished January 2019

    I wrote a blog about my cancer. just click on the link below 

    https://todaymycoffeetasteslikechristmasincostarica.com 

    Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm

    Community Champion badge
  • Sorry to hear about your husband's vocal chord cancer Popsyboy.  My husband had a different type of cancer - squamous cell carcinoma which had spread into his ear - and he was faced with a similar dilemma about RT.  He had major surgery just over 6 weeks ago to remove his outer ear and most of the inner ear, superficial parotidectomy, and neck dissection, along with the T3 tumour and other things.  At 75 he is almost recovered, but it's knocked him for 6 despite being pretty fit for his age, and the skin graft where his ear was has died.  The ENT surgeon said there is no absolute need for RT therapy as the margins were clear, but there were other reasons for it and if he chose to have it then it would need to start soon.  

    I think you're right about 'blithely talking about radiotherapy,' although I think it's well meant and usually suggested for the best possible outcome.  Clearly many patients don't really have a choice, but my husband does and he has decided against it.  I and our adult children said it would have to be his choice and his alone, but once made we all felt it was the right decision for him.  The three main reasons were that at his age the treatment would probably take a year out of his life at a time when he may not have many good ones left (he also has mild Parkinsons Disease), the unhealed wound which apparently could be treated with dressings but the effects of RT on healthy skin can be severe, and the prospect of enduring a gruelling course of treatment only for the cancers to return.  In fact he is going to have another biopsy next week on new lesions on his scalp.

    I don't think there was a right or wrong answer in his case, and maybe not in your husband's either.  It's a difficult decision that only he and you can make, but once you make it you just have to make the best of it.  I have to say that all the consultants, surgeons and nurses we have seen have been really good about it and not tried to push in a particular direction, and now respect his decision.