I have completed 6 treatments of chemo and hepraceptin with a good response. The radiographer stated 98% chance the cancer is gone - can’t be 100% sure until pathology results.
This is all great however I now have to make the decision between a lumpectomy and mascectomy. I had two different cancers and have small breasts so this will take a lot of tissue to send to pathology and I will probably go from a B cup size to an A. I love swimming and would like to look balanced
My other option is to have a mascectomy and reconstruction This procedure is more intrusive and recovery will take longer. I may be removing what is now considered a healthy breast.
There is also the possibility that I proceed with a lumpectomy but pathology ststes there is still cancer and I will require a mascectomy anyway.
Has anyone else been in the same predicament? What were your considerations?
Hi AliElli
I don’t have quite the same experience as my boobs are overly large, so a lumpectomy made little difference. I am however a pool user and it never occurs to me to look for minor differences in symmetry in other pool users. We did have a regular user for a while who had had a single mastectomy and no one batted an eye at her. Once you are in the water no one is going to see anyway. I know if it was my choice I would just have the simpler operation because speedy and simple recovery would be my personal priority.
Macmillan Support Line - 0808 808 00 00, 7 days a week between 8am-8pm
I am a Macmillan volunteer.
I have metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer, in remission
Hi, I had chemo first and it reduced the cancer significantly so I was also given the same choice as you. I elected for the lumpectomy primarily as I wanted the least invasive surgery. I must admit, I didn't like being given a choice and would have preferred to be told, but I did ask my surgeon if it was his wife, what would he be recommending and that helped with my decision. Best wishes
