3 years ago, following several turbos and BCG I had radiation and chemo which appears to have stopped the bladder cancer. However , I now have irradiation cystitus which has resulted in several episodes of heavy bleeding and the need for cortorization of virutally 80% of my bladder....making it virutally useless. The time has come for me to seriously consider a cystectomy but would like some first hand experience (pros and cons) of the post cystectomy alternatives. I unerstand the choices but really would like to have some help in un derstanding which is best for me.
Reading posts on the various forums it seems that so many (majority??) of those with a stoma and plastic bag suffer with leakage.....that horrifies me. But is leakage minimal or such that if you are out in public it is very obvious to everyone? Do you wake up in the night in a wet bed ??
If you opt for the catheter system - how frequently do you have to change caths?
I really would appreciate and comments - I need to do somethig it is just trying to decide what.....
As background - I am 85 (today Christmas day !!) male. Most recently had half a lung out with cancer - unrelated to my bladder cancer. I have acujte copd.
I have always been relatively very active - but not so for the past 4 years.....
Finally may I wish you all the very best seasons greetings and a healthy new year as possible.
The stents which we had post bladder removal are not the same as the stents you currently have-ours were long thin tubes which are only temporary post surgery. We don’t have stents now.
With a urostomy you have no control over when you pee, other than control over when you empty the bag itself. With no bladder, urine has nowhere to be stored, so the stoma diverts the urine outside of the body into the bag. You cannot control the production of urine at all, but you chose when to empty the bag.
When you have your bladder removed, there are 2 possible options-a neobladder inside or a urostomy taking urine outside. Neither Jane nor I had a choice so we both have usostomies- it’s not always possible to choose one or other. Sometimes circumstances mean you have to have a stoma.
Sarah xx
I wonder if you have been reading about nephrostomies, which do involve stents and urine going from the kidneys into a bag outside the body? These are not the same as urostomies, but maybe that’s where any confusion might come from?
Sarah xx
Happy new year.If you are going to have a cystectomy then you will get an appointment with the surgeon to go through the options if you have any.There are pro’s and cons to both Ileal conduit ( stoma) and Neo bladder.It is a big surgery whichever you have and recovery can be very slow.Jane
Where I am at the moment is (courtesy of Mr.Google)
a) urostomy
b) Bladder reconstruction (neobladder)
c) Continent urinary diversion (internal pouch connected to an opening - then catheter)
d) Nephrostomy - direct kidneys to opening in back.
I am discounting d) but am trying to get first hand pros/cons on others.
I have not seen or come across any comments re b) which I think is still peeing thru 'normal channels'. I have read that you can train the new bladder (over a fairly long time???) but due have to use a catheter to completely drain?? Again - am looking for first hand experiences.
Urologists are a bit like car salesmen (sorry) - I need to speak with the drivers...!!!!
Happy New Year to everyone and thank you for the comments.
As I mentioned before, you may not get a choice in what your options are. I didn’t. But rather than going to Google, the best person to speak to is your consultant/surgeon to go through what would be possible in your particular circumstances.
I notice you’ve already had a response on this thread from Teasswill who has a neobladder, so I’ve tagged her to see if she would like to add anything. Obviously I only have knowledge of a urostomy, which I’ve had for coming up to 4 years. If I’d had a choice of neobladder or urostomy I would have chosen urostomy but that’s because of my particular circumstances.
So..to answer your pros/cons of a urostomy from my point of view-there is no training involved, other than to learn how to change the bag. No getting up in the night to the loo because I connect to a larger night bag to sleep. In the day, I simply go to the loo and empty the bag by means of a small tap at the bottom of the bag. it was easy to get into a routine of cleaning round my stoma and changing the bag. I haven’t had to dress differently.
Cons-the bag can leak. For me this is not a frequent occurrence but happens very occasionally both awake and asleep. If I’m going out I carry spare supplies, and on a long outing would carry spare clothes. However my bag has never yet leaked while in public or on holiday! I use a waterproof cover on my mattress just in case, but I also have a colostomy so I am dealing with 2 stomas and therefore potentially 2 bags which could burst! It can be tough at first to find bags which exactly suit you as there are so many different products on the market, but once I found the products which worked well for me I was fine.
While you can read real life experiences here on the group, again I would stress that your consultant/surgeon is the best person to ask about which option is both possible for you and most suitable.
Sarah xx
Hi and Happy new year to all.
I have a Nephrostomy at the moment but it does not involve Stents, it is a tube that goes through the side of the back (same area as Kidney) then it feeds through directly into the kidney which attaches to a bag, it is very similar to a Catheter. You have to wear a purpose made belt to hold the bag which sits around the upper groin area.
Hi again Boot neck. I understand that you are wanting as much info in advance as possible, but google is not the most reliable source! In the UK, if you have RC (radical cystectomy) you are usually given the standard option of a), and if possible b) (depends on a number of factors). I was interested in c) as an option - this is more common in the US. It is known as Mitrofanoff in the UK, or Indiana pouch in the US. It is a continent internal pouch that you self catheterise to empty via a small opening on the abdomen (commonly in the navel). My surgeon advised against that, compared with a0 or b) as more likely to need surgical revision in the longer term. I am not aware of d) as an option at all, although I have heard of a method of diverting urine to the intestine to empty via rectum.
Many hospitals will offer the opportunity to talk to 'drivers' before making a choice (if choice is offered). In my earlier post, I was talking about my option b). The hosp will weigh up your general health before offering cystectomy - it is rigorous and takes some months to fully recover. Having a stoma is probably the shortest time in theatre & easiest to manage post op.
I'm no expert, but it may be they can come up with some alternative arrangement to alleviate your current bladder problems without resorting to surgery. Very best wishes in getting back to a better quality of life.
A friend of mine in the UK has had the Mitrofanoff, and while she was very keen on having this option, she has had a lot of issues with scar tissue resulting in closure of the opening, and has needed several additional surgeries and revisions. She doesn’t regret having it, but for her there have certainly been a lot of post surgery difficulties.
I think the urostomy does seem to be the most simple to get to grips with-mine has thankfully never caused a problem in all this time.
Sarah xx
I not aware of d being an option either.My surgeon said urostomy is more straightforward than neo bladder.If everything had gone according to plan I would have had the cystectomy robotically.I was told that would take about 5 and a half to 6 hours.Putting my poor surgeon through the operation from hell in his words it took nearly 10 hours and I have robotic scars and an abdominal scar.Jane xx
I haven’t had any problems with the urostomy either.It’s good to be able to discuss everything in detail with the surgeon beforehand.Mine was helpful and having my sister there to ask questions was useful.Everything happened so fast for me that having an extra pair of ears at appointments was needed.
Whatever cancer throws your way, we’re right there with you.
We’re here to provide physical, financial and emotional support.
© Macmillan Cancer Support 2025 © Macmillan Cancer Support, registered charity in England and Wales (261017), Scotland (SC039907) and the Isle of Man (604). Also operating in Northern Ireland. A company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales company number 2400969. Isle of Man company number 4694F. Registered office: 3rd Floor, Bronze Building, The Forge, 105 Sumner Street, London, SE1 9HZ. VAT no: 668265007