Hi,
It is normal for doctors to not know the pathology of a tumour?
I have a 15cm tumour that was originally thought to be either ovarian or sarcoma. 4 MDT meetings later, including Urology in case it being kidney related, and it's still inconclusive. Is this normal and which one is it more likely to be?!
I presume the decision soon will be to just remove it?
I was also originally told that it is highly likely to be malignant, looking at the MRI, but now that seems to have changed and there is uncertainty on that....
My serum LDH level is 364, Roche CA 19-9 is 202.5, Se CA 125 is 123, CRP is 53 and serum urea 1.5.
Do these results point to a likelihood of cancer?
Any help would be greatly appreciated please!
I had accepted the likely cancer when I was told so it's not a shock to me but I just want to know - the doubt that other doctors are now saying and how it's equally likely it is benign, is far more frustrating - an answer either way is better than the indecision!