I've been diagnosed with 60mm DCIS. I've had one excision which did not result in clear margins. My surgeon has given me the choice of a further excision, which he says only has 50% chance of successfully removing all the diseased tissue, followed by radiotherapy, or mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy.
I don't understand why mastectomy necessarily involves sentinel node excision when lumpectomy doesn't. Surely the risk of the cancer having spread is the same regardless of the surgery I choose?
The surgeon says there's only a 2% chance of developing lymphoedema after sentinel node excision but my reading seems to come up with a figure of 20%. This alone would suggest to me a second wide excision is preferable to a mastectomy. Do you have any further information on this subject?
The outcome (chance of recurrence and of still being alive 10 years later) appears to be the same for both surgeries. The surgeon says it's entirely my choice. Trouble is I don't know what to choose. I know I don't want reconstruction.
The tissue in my breast around the excision site is now hard and lumpy, which I'm told is normal. Will it stay that way or will it soften up again in time? The skin is numb - will it ever regain sensation?
I'm sure I'll think of more questions, but that's a good start.
And thanks in advance for any replies.
